Grantland names Danny Manning No. 14 best college player

 

Grantland named their top 50 greatest college basketball players. Kansas managed to get one name on the list.

 14. Danny Manning (Kansas, 1984-1988): As a freshman, he seemed overhyped. As it turns out, he was “accurately hyped.” The Jayhawks won the national title when Manning was a senior, despite a mediocre 21-11 record during the regular season; had he turned pro as a junior, they might have missed the NIT.

 

Source: Grantland.com

I honestly don’t have a problem with many of the names ahead of Manning at No. 14 except JJ Reddick and Tyler Hansbrough.

The author listed his criteria as:

  • Talent. This is the most important quality. However — and I cannot stress this enough — it’s not theonly quality. It’s 50 percent of the equation, and sometimes less.
  • The individual’s college career must be more meaningful than his pro career. This doesn’t mean the player had to be a professional bust, or even a professional disappointment — the candidate could be still be the league MVP, win multiple Larry O’Brien trophies, and spend his summers playing Clue in Billy Hunter’s boathouse with Hubie Brown.1 It does not require anyone to be a terrible NBA product. However, the peak of the player’s career needs to happen when they’re working for free (or at least pretending to work for free). If an objective, informed fan hears this person’s name, they should reflexively associate that individual’s greatness with the idiom of college basketball. That’s the key — any theoretical pro career is just something semi-irrelevant that happened later in life.
  • Ideally, the player should possess an unorthodox game. Are you an undersized two-guard with no conscience? Do your unnaturally long arms compensate for your lack of a natural position? Do your physical limitations give you a paradoxical advantage? Were you the “one man” on a “one-man team”? Are there no other players comparable to your rarified version of weirdness? If so, congratulations. These are the qualities that make you memorable.
  • There needs to be something vaguely “collegiate” about the individual’s persona. This, obviously, is an abstraction; ranking college players on how “collegiate” they seem is a little like ranking filmmakers on how “cinematic” they act. But there’s still something to this, even if it’s impossible to quantify: I like unfinished people. I like players who are still figuring out who they are. I like guys who wear sweaters instead of suits. You can disagree with the logic of my argument, but it’s not really based on logic, so your argument will fail.
  • As with any historical list, my age is a bias. I am 39. I’m aware that human nature causes us to (a) romanticize players we remember from childhood, (b) lionize people we’ve only read about, and (c) undervalue modern players who seem like lesser versions of people we’ve seen before.
  • The dead are valued more than the living. I’m simply being honest here: It helps to be dead. If I have to choose between a dead legend and a living legend, it’s never a difficult choice.

I found it really odd that Wilt Chamberlain was completely left off the list. He changed the game.

22 thoughts on “Grantland names Danny Manning No. 14 best college player

  • October 12, 2021 at 3:43 am
    Permalink

    Hello there! This post couldn’t be written any better!

    Reading this post reminds me of my good old room mate!
    He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him.
    Fairly certain he will have a good read.
    Many thanks for sharing!

  • October 18, 2021 at 6:39 am
    Permalink

    Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if
    you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest
    twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have
    some experience with something like this.
    Please let me know if you run into anything.
    I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.

  • October 29, 2021 at 10:14 pm
    Permalink

    hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely
    picked up something new from right here.
    I did however expertise several technical issues using this site, since I experienced to reload the site many
    times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK?
    Not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading instances times
    will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your high quality score if advertising
    and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email
    and can look out for a lot more of your respective interesting content.
    Ensure that you update this again soon.

  • October 29, 2021 at 11:01 pm
    Permalink

    Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing to
    be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they plainly don’t know about.

    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole
    thing without having side effect , people could take a signal.
    Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

Comments are closed.